Home
nospam@'s livejournal - August 11th, 2007 [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Walt Manitoba

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

August 11th, 2007

Blathering blatherskite! [Aug. 11th, 2007|01:25 pm]
As a talented storyteller with an active imagination, I'm impelled to share this week's excitement with you.

  • Tuesday: A student loan representative leaves a grave-sounding voice mail; it is "very important" that I call him. Returning the call, I am told there is no record of anyone having called me.
  • Friday: I receive an e-mail from my online savings bank, "Due Diligence 2nd Request". In my reply, I object that I never received a 1st request, and that I did indeed submit at application time the employment information they've just requested. Three hours later, they e-mail to apologize for the error.

I was touched with slight paranoia. 'Cause it's not every week that a financial institution has a bureaucratic snafu, right? You would have heard of it on the news.

A friend with the same account type at this bank got the same two e-mails, so it's reasonable to assume that everyone with the account got it. And while every big institution keeps a record of every damn thing, you can count on the info being stored in a diffuse system with hierarchies of access control.

As an aside, isn't this portion of the bank e-mail
Please disregard the email sent on August 10, 2007, with the subject line: Due Diligence 2nd Request. This email was sent in error and we apologize for the confusion it has caused. If Due Diligence information is required, you will receive a follow-up email. Again we apologize for this inconvenience.

typical Kafkaesque nonsense? "We won't offer an explanation for the mistake, which perhaps wasn't a mistake and we have the right to at any time inquire again." Perhaps the writer tried to be reasonable and honest to the extent a professional veneer allows. I can appreciate the challenge of that sort of writing, but... it still gnaws at me. How can anyone conscious fail to be insulted by such cant?



Two of my colleagues are bombarding me with this "9/11 truth" stuff and won't let up. I'm weakened.
I'm not fond of corporate category mistakes and the arbitrary capitalization of business terms, neither!
Link[reply]

navigation
[ viewing | August 11th, 2007 ]
[ go | Previous Day|Next Day ]

Advertisement